By Rebecca Richmond
These comments were made in Toronto by pro-choice activists at a rally, underscoring the importance and the impact of campus pro-life activism. Watch the clip here. In their own words: “We can’t let our guard down”
To better appreciate what they’re saying, I have included a transcript (with my own comments and corrections in line).
“They are heating up their end of things. They are mobilizing wherever they can to challenge pro-choice forces. And they are trying to do it a lot on campus.”
Is there any better place to discuss and debate controversial issues and challenge the status quo than on university campuses?
“There’s been a lot of stuff at U of T.”
Go U of T Students for Life! Keep up the great work!
“Coming up on March 14th, there’s going to be a debate at the University of Toronto. The anti-choice is organizing with a woman from this group called the Centre for Bio-Ethical Reform, I believe it’s called.”
Yes, there will be a debate and I’m looking forward to it! Stephanie Gray will be presenting the pro-life position and she is the Executive Director of the Canadian Centre for Bio-Ethical Reform .
“Basically it’s the GAP, the Genocide Awareness Project, what they call it.”
The Genocide Awareness Project is one of the educational tools that the Canadian Centre for Bio-Ethical Reform uses. However, the debate in question is not GAP but, as the title suggestions, a debate. A debate is defined as a formal, regulated discussion of an issue with two opposing views presented. This debate will, as such, present both sides of the issue of abortion: pro-life and pro-choice.
“Which is these big, monstr – you know, giant-sized signs that they display on campuses and that are so offensive and that are just so horrible.”
The signs are offensive and horrible, but that is because they accurately reflect the offensive and horrible reality of abortion. To quote pro-choice feminist Naomi Wolf: “The pro-choice movement often treats with contempt the pro-lifers’ practice of holding up to our faces their disturbing graphics….[But] how can we charge that it is vile and repulsive for pro-lifers to brandish vile and repulsive images if the images are real? To insist that truth is in poor taste is the very height of hypocrisy.”
-16 Naomi Wolf, “Our Bodies, Our Souls,” The New Republic, 16 October 1996.
“So they’re going to have a debate on campus with a doctor I’ve never heard of, but I think, if people are interested (and we’ll send out an email about that), it’s on March 14th, I think pro-choice supporters should show up en masse and we should support anybody who’s on campus who’s standing up for choice. “
First off, the ‘doctor’ in question is Doctor Ainslie. The speaker may not have heard of him but he’s certainly more than qualified. Professor Ainslie is the chair of both the Department of Philosophy in the Faculty of Arts and Science and the Graduate Department of Philosophy. In January he was named principal of University College. One of his major fields of study is bioethics.
Second, I hope pro-choicers show up with open minds and with respect for the debate.
“Because they’re trying just basically to populate the campus with their activities and their things.”
We’re trying to save lives and change hearts and minds. Having activities, events and an active presence on campus are means to accomplish our goals.
“For many of us, we thought we had sort of won this battle many years ago and clearly it’s not, it’s not something we can ever let our guard down.”